 |
Publisher: Peytchinski Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1312-773X (Online)
Issue: 2023, vol. 29, issue1
Subject Area: Dental Medicine
-
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2023291.4779
Published online: 26 January 2023
Original article
J of IMAB. 2023 Jan-Mar;29(1):4779-4783
COMPARATIVE CEPHALOMETRIC AND 3D CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANALISIS OF ALVEOLAR BONE DESTRUCTION FOR TEETH IN ANTERIOR CROSSBITE
Stilyana Krasteva1
, Silviya Krasteva2, Konstantin Georgiev2, Anzhelina Krasteva2,
1) Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University - Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
2) Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University - Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
ABSTRACT:
Purpose: To assess the degree of bone destruction for teeth in anterior crossbite by means of 3D cone beam computed tomography and lateral cephalometry.
Material/methods: 20 patients with anterior crossbite underwent 3D cone beam computed tomography and lateral cephalometry of the anterior segments of the maxilla and mandible. The destruction of the bone in the anterior segments of the maxilla and mandible was measured (vestibularly and lingually)– the distance from the cemento-enamel junction to the top of the alveolar bone. The parameters of bone resorption for teeth 21 and 31 on cephalogramsand 3D computed tomography images were compared. For both incisors, the mean value registered by means of cephalometry was slightly higher than that registered with 3D.
Results: The total mean value of bone destruction for anterior teeth was significantly higher vestibularly compared to lingually, both for the maxilla (p = 0.030) and mandible (p = 0.030). Significantly higher mean values of bone destruction were found in the mandible compared to the maxilla. For both incisors (21 and 31), the mean value of resorption recorded by cephalometry was slightly higher than that recorded by 3D cone beam computed tomography, but without statistical significance.
Conclusion: We found significantly higher values of vestibular bone destruction compared to lingual bone destruction. Bone destruction in the mandible reached a significantly higher level than that in the maxilla. No statistically significant difference was found between the mean values of bone destruction measured by means of cephalometry and 3D cone beam computed tomography.
Keywords: crossbite, alveolar bone destruction, 3D cone beam computed tomography, cephalometry,
- Download FULL TEXT /PDF 1211 KB/
Please cite this article as: Krasteva S, Krasteva S, Georgiev K, Krasteva A. Comparative Cephalometric and 3D Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analisis of Alveolar Bone Destruction for Teeth in Anterior Crossbite. J of IMAB. 2023 Jan-Mar;29(1):4779-4783. DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2022281.4779
Correspondence to: Stilyana Krasteva, Department of Periodontology and Oral diseases, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical Univeristy- Plovdiv; 3, HristoBotev Blvd., 3rd floor, Plovdiv, Bulgaria; E-mail: Stilyana.Krasteva@mu-plovdiv.bg
REFERENCES:
1. Andrade RN, Tôrres FR, Ferreira RFA, Cathanarino F. Treatment of anterior crossbite and its influence on gingival recession. RGO, Rev Gaucha Odontol. 2014 Oct-Dec;62(4):411-16. [Crossref]
2. Andreeva L, Dilkova N.A pilot study of the causes of recession- systematization of literature and blitz epidemiological study. Orthodonticreview. 2016; 18(2):54-65. [in Bulgarian]
3. Kundapur PP, Bhat KM, Bhat GS. Association of Trauma from Occlusion with Localized Gingival Recession in Mandibular Anterior Teeth. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2009 Fall;6(2):71-4. [PubMed]
4. Ustun K, Sari Z, Orucoglu H, Duran I, Hakki S. Severe Gingival Recession Caused by Traumatic Occlusion and Mucogingival stress: A case report. Eur J Dent. 2008 April;2:127- 33. [PubMed]
5. Han JY, Jung GU. Labial and lingual/palatal bone thickness of maxillary and mandibular anteriors in human cadavers in Koreans. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2011 Apr;41(2):60-6. [PubMed]
6. Richman C. Is gingival recession a consequence of an orthodontic tooth size and/or tooth position discrepancy? ”A paradigm shift”. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011 Jan-Feb;32(1):62-9. [PubMed]
7. Seehra J, Fleming PS, DiBiase AT. Orthodontic treatment of localized gingival recession associated with traumatic anteriorc rossbite. Aust Orthod J. 2009 May;25(1):76-81. [PubMed]
8. Kalina E, Zadurska M, Sobieska E, Górski B. Relationship between periodontal status of mandibular incisors and selected cephalometric parameters:Preliminaryresults. J Orofac Orthop. 2019 May;80(3):107-115. [PubMed]
9. Foosiri P, Mahatumarat K, Panmekiate S. Relationship between mandibula rsymphysis dimensions and mandibular anterior alveolar bone thickness asassessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Jan-Feb;23(1):54-62. [PubMed]
10. Kapila SD, Nernina JM. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015 Jan;44(1):20140282. [PubMed]
Received: 03 May 2022
Published online: 26 January 2023