head JofIMAB
Journal of IMAB - Annual Proceeding (Scientific Papers)
Publisher: Peytchinski Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1312-773X (Online)
Issue: 2022, vol. 28, issue1
Subject Area: Medicine
-
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2022281.4183
Published online: 05 January 2022

Original article
J of IMAB. 2022 Jan-Mar;28(1):4183-4185
ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF ADVANTAGES FROM LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY
Konstantin KostovORCID logo Corresponding Autoremail,
Department of General, Visceral and Emergency Surgery, UMHATEM “N. I. Pirogov” – Sofia, Bulgaria.

ABSTRACT:
Purpose: The aim of the study is to evaluate the advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy fromour clinical experience in UMHATEM "Pirogov" which resulted in reduced postoperative complications, pain, length of hospital stay, and early return to work.
Material and Methods: Data from a study of a patient group in the Department of General, Visceral and Emergency Surgery of UMBALSM "H. I. Pirogov "for the six-month period (01.01.2019 до 01.07.2019) were collected.Eighty-one patients with acute appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy were selected. Indicators characterizing basic clinical and pathological features (epidemiology, demography, degree of pathological impairment), surgical approach and its outcomes (postoperative complications, postoperative duration), influence of concomitant factors were studied.
Results: The study included 81 patients. The majority of patients were women - 46 (56.79%), men- 35 (43.21%).  The mean age of male patients was 31.4 years and for female-28.6 years respectively. Hospitalization times are usually short - most patients are given up to 72 hours (70- 86.42%). Only eleven patients (13.58%) had an extended hospital stay for observation and additional therapy.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy was verified as an optimal and safe surgical procedure. Laparoscopic approach reduces post-operative pain, shortens hospital stay, reduces complications, and thereby reducing treatment costs.

Keywords: evaluation, acute appendicitis, laparoscopy, advantages, approach,

pdf - Download FULL TEXT /PDF 492 KB/
Please cite this article as: Kostov K. Analysis and evaluation of advantages from laparoscopic appendectomy. J of IMAB. 2022 Jan-Mar;28(1):4183-4185. DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2022281.4183

Corresponding AutorCorrespondence to: Konstantin Kostov, MD, PhD. Surgical Clinic, UMHATEM “N. I. Pirogov”; 21, Totleben Blvd., 1606 Sofia, Bulgaria; E-mail: dr.k.kostov@gmail.com

REFERENCES:
1. Costa-Navarro D, Jiménez-Fuertes M, IllànRiquelme A. Laparoscoic appendectomy: quality care and cost-effectiveness for today’s economy. World J Emerg Surg. 2013 Nov 1; 8(1): 45. [PubMed]
2. Editorial. A sound approach to the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Lancet. 1987 Jan 24; 1(8526):198-200. [PubMed]
3. Horvath P, Lange J, Bachmann R, Struller F, Königsrainer A, Zdichavsky M. Comparison of clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):199-205 [PubMed]
4. Kehagias I, Karamanaks SN, Panagiotopoulos S, Panagopoulos K, Kalfarentzos F. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which way to go? World J. Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug 21;14(31):4909–14. [PubMed]
5. Wullstein C, Barkhausen S, Gross E. Results of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum.  2001 Nov;44(11):1700–5. [PubMed]
6. McBurney C. IV. The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg. 1894 Jul;20(1):38-43. [PubMed]
7. Van LV, Jose MV. Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Appendectomy. Ann Surg. 1993 Nov; 218(5):685-692. [PubMed]
8. Nana AM, Ouandji CN, Simoens C, Smets D, Mendes da Costa P. Laparoscopic appendectomies: results of a monocentric prospective and non-randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jun; 54(76):1146-1152. [PubMed]
9. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983 Mar;15(2):59-64. [PubMed]
10. Long KH, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Helgeson ER, Harmsen WS, Smith CD, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: clinical and economic analyses. Surgery. 2001 Apr;129(4):390-400.  [PubMed]
11. Del Pino C, Muñoz R, Rada G. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Medwave. 2018 Dec 11;18(8):e7370. [PubMed]
12. Talha A, El-Haddad H, Ghazal AE, Shehata G. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in adults: randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):907-914. [PubMed]
13. Delibegović S, Karabeg R, Simatović M. Securing the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy. Med Glas (Zenica). 2020 Aug 1;17(2):252-255. [PubMed]
14. Siotos C, Stergios K, Prasath V, Seal SM, Duncan MD, Sakran JV, Habibi M. Irrigation Versus Suction in Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis: A Meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:237-243. [PubMed].

Received: 19 May 2021
Published online: 05 January 2022

back to Online Journal