 |
Publisher: Peytchinski Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1312-773X (Online)
Issue: 2021, vol. 27, issue1
Subject Area: Dental Medicine
-
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2021271.3510
Published online: 12 January 2021
Review article
J of IMAB. 2021 Jan-Mar;27(1):3510-3517
TECHNIQUES FOR FIXED DENTAL RESTORATIONS REMOVAL - CLASSIFICATION, DECISION ON THE CORRECT APPROACH, ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES
Radostina Vasileva
,
Department of Dental Material Science and Propedeutics of Prosthetic Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University Varna, Bulgaria.
ABSTRACT:
Introduction: Fixed dental restorations possess a predefined period of use. Most often they are removed by means of sectioning which renders them unusable. Reasons exist when practitioners shall preserve the restoration, applying conservative approaches for removing. In the literature, apart from the classic destructive technique with sectioning, conservative, semi-conservative and combined techniques for removal are described.
The aim of this article is to present a complete classification and description of different approaches to remove permanently and temporarily fixed prosthetic constructions.
Materials and methods: A literature study was conducted athe beginning of 2019. Information was gathered using dental textbooks on the topic specified and online scientific databases such as PubMed, ResearchGate, etc.
Conclusion Through this article, a conclusion was drawn that a full classification or description of removal techniques for fixed dentures has not been done in the Bulgarian literature so far. It is reported that information for patients about advantages, disadvantages and dangers of removing a permanently cemented restoration is of great importance. Except for the destructive ones, all methods described here may be used when removing temporarily fixated constructions. The selection of the ideal system or a combination depends on the clinical situation. Safest and most atraumatic for underlying structures when removing permanently cemented restorations is the destructive approach. Practitioners must be precisely familiar with the techniques so as to be able to preserve the construction, to avoid any danger connected with the clinical case. According to data gathered, no approach is universally applicable when removing fixed prosthetic restorations.
Keywords: correct removal techniquе, crown failure, dental crown remover,
- Download FULL TEXT /PDF 523 KB/
Please cite this article as: Vasileva R. Techniques for fixed dental restorations removal - classification, decision on the correct approach, advantages and disadvantages. J of IMAB. 2021 Jan-Mar;27(1):3510-3517. DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2021271.3510
Correspondence to: Assist. Prof. Dr Radostina Vasileva, PhD, Department of Dental Material Science and Propedeutics of Prosthetic Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University Varna; 84, Tsar Osvoboditel Str., 9000 Varna, Bulgaria; E-mail: radost11dent@abv.bg
REFERENCES:
1. Kisov Hr. Dental cements and techniques for fixing prosthetic constructions. Continuous-improvement-Ltd, Sofia. 2008. [in Bulgarian]
2. Addy LD, Bartley A, Hayes SJ. Crown and bridge disassembly—when, why and how. Dent Update. 2007 Apr;34(3):140-2, 145-6, 149-50. [PubMed]
3. Sharma A, Rahul GR, Poduval ST, Shetty K. Removal of failed crown and bridge. J Clin Exp Dent. 2012 Jul 1;4(3):e167-72. [PubMed]
4. Schwass DR, Lyons KM, Purton DG. How long will it last? The expected longevity of prosthodontic and restorative treatment. N Z Dent J. 2013 Sep;109(3):98-105.[PubMed]
5. Bajunaid SO. Review of techniques for the intact removal of a permanently cemented restoration. Gen.Dent. 2017 Sep-Oct; 65 (5): 48-53. [PubMed]
6. Herman GL. Bucco-lingual ‘dimple’ technique for removing full-crown and cast-metal restorations. J Mich Dent Assoc. 2011Aug; 93:42-44. [PubMed]
7. Conny DJ, Brown MH. Simplified technique for the removal of a fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent. 1981 Nov; 46(5):505-8. [PubMed]
8. Varghese VS, Uppin V, Pujar M, Kurian N, Barad N. Crown Removal Approaches: Regaining Entry to the Pulp Chamber. Indian J Appl Res. 2016 Mar;6(3):245-248.
9. Gluskin AH, Peters CI, Wong RDM, Ruddle CJ. Retreatment of non-healing endodontic therapy and management of mishaps. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC, eds. Ingle’s Endodontics. 6th ed. Hamilton, Canada: BC Decker; 2008:1088-1161.
10. Oliva R. Review of methods for removing cast gold restorations. JADA 1979 Nov;99(5):840-847. [PubMed]
11.Trenter SC, Walmsley AD. Ultrasonic dental scaler: associated hazards. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Feb;30(2):95-101. [PubMed]
12. Karnoff EM. Removing cemented crowns and bridges without destroying them. N Y J Dent. 1975 May;45(5):158-9. [PubMed]
13. Walton JN. Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent. 1986 Oct; 56: 416-21. [PubMed]
14. Wise MD. Failure in restored dentition-management and treatment, 2nd Ed, Quintessence Publishing co 1996.
15. Reuter J, Brose MO. Failures in full crown retained dental bridges. Br Dent J 1984 Jul; 21;157(2):61-3. [PubMed]
16. Al Moaleem MM. Systems and Techniques for Removal of Failed Fixed Partial Dentures: A Review. Am J Health Res. 2016 Jul;109-116. [Crossref]
17. Janardanan K, Varkey VK, Lovely M, Anuroopa A. Coronal disassembly systems and techniques: An overview. J Interdisciplinary Dent. 2014 Jan; 4(1):33.[Crossref]
18. Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC. Ingle’s Endodontics. 6th ed. Hamilton, Ontario: BC Decker Inc.; 2008.
19. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics, 4th Ed. St. Louis (MO): Mosby Elsevier 2006.
20. Alsiyabi AS, Felton DA. Technique for removing cement between a fixed prosthesis and its substructure. J Prosthodont 2009 Apr;18(3):279-8218. [PubMed]
21. de Melo Filho AB, Mori M, Jardini MAN, Landim KT, Solis AC. Effect of ultrasonic instrumentation on the bond strength of crowns cemented with zinc phosphate cement to natural teeth. An in vitro study. Braz Oral Res 2008 Jul-Sep; 22(3): 270-4. [PubMed]
22. Parreira FR, O’Connor RP, Hutter JW. Cast prosthesis removal using ultrasonics and a thermo-plastic resin adhesive. J Endod. 1994 Mar; 20(3):141-3 [PubMed]
23. McQuade MJ, Huget EF, de Simon LB, Levin MP. Effect of ultrasonic instrumentation on the retention of simulated cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1978 Jun; 39(6):640-2. [PubMed]
24. Oliva RA. Clinical evaluation of a new crown and fixed partial denture remover. J Prosthet Dentistry 1980 Sep.;44(3):267-9. [PubMed]
25. van As Glenn A. Using the Erbium Laser to Remove Porcelain Veneers in 60 Seconds Minimally Invasive, Efficient, and Safe. J Cosm Dent. 2013; 28:21-34.
26. Morford CK, Buu NC, Rechmann BM, Finzen FC, Sharma AB, Rechmann P. Er: YAG laser debonding of porcelain veneers. Lasers Surg Med. 2011 Dec;43(10): 965-74. [PubMed]
27. Ghazanfari R, Azimi N, Nokhbatolfoghahaei H, Alikhasi M. Laser Aided Ceramic Restoration Removal: A Comprehensive Review. J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Feb;10(2):86-91. [PubMed]
28. Oztoprak MO, Tozlu M, Iseri U, Ulkur F, Arun T. Effects of different application durations of scanning laser method on debonding strength of laminate veneers. Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Jul;27(4):713-6. [ PubMed]
29. Spath A, Smith C. Removal of modern ceramics. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2017 May;38(5):326-333 [PubMed]
30. Eick S, Meier I, Spoerle F, et al. In vitro-activity of Er: YAG laser in compassion with other treatment modalities on biofilmablation from implant and tooth surfaces. PLoS One 2017 Jan;26;12(1):e0171086 [PubMed]
31. Gurney ML, Sharples SD, Phillips WB, Lee DJ. Using an Er,Cr:YSGG laser to remove lithium disilicate restorations: A pilot study.J Prosthet Dent 2016 Jan;115(1):90-4. [PubMed]
32. Dostalova T, Jelinkova H, Remes M, et al. The use of the Er: YAGLaser for bracket debonding and its effect on enamel damage.Photomed Laser Surg. 2016 Sep;34(9):394-9 [PubMed]
33. Deeb JG, Bencharit S, Dalal N, Abdulmajeed A, Grzech-Leśniak K. Using Er:YAG laser to remove lithium disilicate crowns from zirconia implant abutments: An in vitro study. PLoS One. 2019 Nov;5;14(11):e0223924. [PubMed]
34. Kellesarian S, Malignaggi VR, Aldosary K, Javed F. Laser-assisted removal of all ceramic fixed dental prostheses:A comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 May;30(3):216-222 [PubMed]
35.Grzech-Leśniak K, Bencharit S, Dalal N, Mroczka K, Deeb JG. In Vitro Examination of the Use of Er:YAG Laser to Retrieve Lithium Disilicate Crowns from Titanium Implant Abutments. J Prosthodont. 2019 Jul;28(6):672-676. [PubMed]
36. Zhang Y, Rocca JP, Fornaini C, Zhen Y, Zhao Z, Merigo E. Erbium-Doped, Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Debonding of Porcelain Laminate Veneers: An Ex vivo Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):570-573 [PubMed]
37. Farah RI, Aldhafeeri AF, Alogaili RS. A technique to facilitate ceramic veneer cementation.J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Aug;120(2):194-197. [PubMed]
38. Ewing JE. Fixed Partial Prosthesis. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1959.
39. Girard JL. Advancement in the removal of permanently cemented crowns and bridges. Smile Dent J. 2010 5:430-6.
40. Bignardi C, Zanetti EM, Terzini M, Ciccola AR, Schierano G, Audenino AL. Reliability, Learnability and Efficiency of Two Tools for Cement Crowns Retrieval in Dentistry Open Biomed Eng J. 2018 Jun 29;12:27-35. [PubMed]
41. Liebenberg WH. Modification to a ‘safe crown-removal technique’: A case report. Br Dent J. 1994 Jan 22;176(2):71-3. [PubMed]
42. Verrett RG, Mansueto MA. Removal of a metal-ceramic fixed partial denture with a loose retainer. J Prosthodont 2003 2003 Mar;12(1):13-6. [PubMed]
43. Herman GL. Bucco-lingual ‘dimple’ technique for removing full-crown and cast-metal restorations. J Mich Dent Assoc. 2011 Aug;93(8):42-4. [PubMed]
44. Westerman RD. A new paradigm for the construction and service of fixed prosthodontics. Dent Today 1999 Jun; 18(6):62-9. [PubMed]
45. Tylman SD. Theory and Practice of Crown and Bridge Prosthodontics. 5th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1965.
Received: 13 December 2019
Published online: 12 January 2021