 |
Publisher: Peytchinski Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 1312-773X (Online)
Issue: 2020, vol. 26, issue2
Subject Area: Dental Medicine
-
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2020262.3155
Published online: 27 May 2020
Original article
J of IMAB. 2020 Apr-Jun;26(2):3155-3159
IN VITRO EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF OPTICAL MAGNIFICATION ON THE PREPARATION FOR VENEERS
Aleksandra Pecheva1
, Snezhana Tsanova1, Ralitsa Raycheva2,
1) Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dental medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
2) Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
ABSTRACT:
Purpose: The preparation of hard dental tissues for veneers is а very technically demanding process, where minimal invasive manner matters. The optical magnification offers higher resolution; brighter and enlarged three-dimensional images which improve the precision and the working posture. The study is evaluating the impact of optical magnification on the precision of tooth preparation under simulated clinical conditions in а digital manner.
Materials and Methods: For the test specimens, 60 plastic upper incisors are divided into 3 groups (n= 20): 1st group - teeth prepared with a naked human eye.; 2nd group - teeth prepared using compound loups x2,5 magnification; 3rd – teeth prepared using an operating microscope under x6.0 magnification. A laboratory scanning device is used to scan the teeth both before and after the preparation phase. Computer- aided design software is used to overlay the outlines of the teeth it all groups. A sagittal plane is constructed throughout the digital teeth images, and measurements of cut hard dental tissues are done in order to evaluate the accurateness of tooth preparation according to the depth of preparation.
Results: There is a statistical difference between the pre-established volume of preparation and the actual cut of hard dentinal tissues no matter the magnification. There is a statistically significant difference between the depth of preparation in naked eye cases and the magnification cases.
Conclusions: The quantity of cut tissues it more than the preestablished parameters which may affect the quality of the adhesive bond and it is controversy with the minimally invasive approach. The preparation under magnification is much more precise when compared to a naked eye.
Keywords: magnification, preparation for veneers, operating microscope, preparation precision,
- Download FULL TEXT /PDF 1183 KB/
Please cite this article as: Pecheva A, Tsanova S, Raycheva R. In vitro evaluation of the impact of optical magnification on the preparation for veneers. J of IMAB. 2020 Apr-Jun;26(2):3155-3159.
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2020262.3155
Correspondence to: Dr Aleksandra Pecheva, Department of Operative Dentistry and Еndodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv; 3, Hristo Botev Blvd., Plovdiv, Bulgaria; E-mail: aleksandra_pecheva@hotmail.com
REFERENCES:
1. Hegde R, Hegde V. Magnification-enhanced contemporary dentistry: Getting started. J Interdiscip Dentistry. 2016; 6(2):91-100. [Crossref]
2. Carr GB. Magnification and illumination in endodontics. In: Hardin FJ, editor. Clark’s clinical dentistry, 1998; vol. 4. p. 1–14.
3. van As GA. The use of extreme magnification in fixed prosthodontics. Dent Today. 2003 Jun; 22(6):93-9. [PubMed]
4. Leknius C, Geissberger M. The effect of magnification on the performance of fixed prosthodontic procedures. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1995 Dec; 23(12):66-70 [PubMed]
5. Schultheiss D, Denil J. History of the microscope and development of microsurgery: a revolution for reproductive tract surgery. Andrologia. 2002 Sep; 34(4):234-41 [PubMed]
6. Mamoun JS. The maxillary molar endodontic access opening: A microscope-based approach. Eur J Dent. 2016 Jul- Sep;10(3):439-446 [PubMed]
7. Mittal S, Kumar T, Sharma J. An innovative approach in microscopic endodontics. J Conserv Dent. 2014 May;17(3):297-8. [PubMed]
8. LeSage BP. Minimally invasive dentistry: paradigm shifts in preparation design. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2009 Mar-Apr;21(2):97-101. [PubMed]
9. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont. 1999; 12(2):111-21 [PubMed]
10. LeSage B, Wells D. Myths vs. realities: two viewpoints on prepared veneers and prep- less veneers. J Cosm Dent. 2011 Summer;27(2):67-72.
11. Ferrari М, Patroni S, Balleri P. Measurement of enamel thickness in relation to reduction for etched laminate veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992; 12(5):407-13 [PubMed]
12. Narula K, Kundabala M, Shetty N, Shenoy R. Evaluation of Tooth Preparations for Class II Cavities Using Magnification Loupes Among Dental Interns and Final Year BDS Students in Preclinical Laboratory. J Conserv Dent. 2015 Jul-Aug; 18(4):284-7. [PubMed] [Crossref]
13. Farook SA, Stokes RJ, Davis AKJ, Sneddon K, Collyer J. Use of Dental Loupes Among Dental Trainers and Trainees in the UK. J Investig Clin Dent. 2013 May;4(2):120-3. [PubMed]
14. Branson BG, Abnos RM, Simmer-Beck ML, King GW, Siddicky SF. Using Motion Capture Technology to Measure the Effects of Magnification Loupes on Dental Operator Posture: A Pilot Study. Work. 2018; 59(1):131-9. [PubMed]
15. Wajngarten D, Petromilli P. Expanding the Operating Field in Endodontics: From magnification loupes to microscope. Dent oral biology and craniofacial research. 2018 Mar;1(1):2-4.
Received: 20 May 2019
Published online: 27 May 2020